Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Oil on Troubled waters.........

Brazos Wind Farm in the plains of West TexasImage via Wikipedia

Hate It, Love It, OIl is Here to Stay

Updated: Tuesday, 06 Jul 2010, 12:43 PM CDT
Published : Tuesday, 06 Jul 2010, 12:43 PM CDT
HOUSTON - With so very much crude on collision course with the gulf coast there remains one enormously inconvenient, but undeniable truth. 

That is, like or not, we'll need as much oil as we can possibly suck out of the ground for at least a full century. 

Those who think differently have yet to dismantle the hard facts of global demand as assembled by Texas based writer and researcher Robert Bryce

"If oil didn't exist we'd have to invent it. No other substance can compare when it comes to energy density, flexibility, convenience, cost, ease of handling. It is almost a miraculous substance," says Bryce. 

"Oil allows mobility and without mobility we don't have commerce," adds the author of Power Hungry-The myths of "green" energy and the real fuels of the future. 

Bryce says those who'd like alternatives to take the place of hydrocarbons, sooner rather than later, simply haven't done the math or reviewed the science. He has, and concludes that in a world which demands 223 million barrels of oil equivalent each and every day, alternatives don't have the fundamental energy density to make much of a dent, at least in the near term. 

For example, it takes more than 800 square miles filled with giant wind turbines to match the out put of a single nuclear power plant. 
"The wind energy business makes the corn ethanol business look like chump change. This is the biggest scam of the modern era. Cellulosic ethanol is like the Easter bunny or the tooth fairy. A lot of people believe in it, but nobody ever sees it," says Bryce, who backs his arguments with convincing mathematical calculations. 
As for solar, Bryce says the 35th biggest coal mine in America, by itself, produces roughly twice as much raw energy per day as all the nation's solar panels and cells combined. Bottom line. 

"Nine out of ten units of power we consume come from hydrocarbons - coal, oil and natural gas. Love them, hate them, don't care, they are here to stay, because we simply don't have replacements for them."
So, in a world with 1.6 billion people who still lack, but desperately desire electricity, how exactly do we reduce global warming by moving away from coal and petroleum consumption ? 
Laced with frustration, Bryce's answer is measured in BTU's.
"We now have galaxies of natural gas in the U.S., a hundred year supply or more. But Dick Cheney will have to water board Barrack Obama before we ever hear the words natural gas. I cannot understand. He'll talk about solar and wind all day," says Bryce.
Gauging what he calls "the hard reality of thermodynamics", Bryce believes expanding natural gas usage as a bridge fuel to a future filled with highly efficient nukes is both a no-brainer and America's best bet
"There is no such thing as a free lunch in the energy business or anything else," he insists.
As for ideology, political or otherwise, Bryce says his only true loyalty is to uninterrupted air-conditioning and cold beer.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, July 5, 2010

Refugees knocking on the door......

Climate Change * Global Warming IImage by Tomás Rotger via Flickr

MORE refugees will knock on Australia's door unless rich countries help poorer nations cope with climate change, a key UN scientist has warned.
Professor Martin Parry - a prominent UK scientist who chaired the last United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment of the impact of climate change - said wealthy countries such as Australia had “good, selfish reasons” to spend money helping the developing world adapt to global warming.
He said climate change assistance to the developing world was tipped to reach $50 billion a year by 2020 - double the amount of other types of foreign aid.

Enhanced by Zemanta

James Delingpole

James Delingpole

James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome To Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future And It Doesn't Work,How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com.

'Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists

 
Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?
Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.
The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.
Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?
And how many scientists, with bachelor of science degrees or higher, have signed the Oregon Petition expressing doubts about Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)? 31,000 plus.
And how many  of the supposed 2500 climate scientists responsible for the IPCC “consensus” were actively involved in the sections to do with AGW? 53.
And how many scientists does it require to successfully falsify – ie prove wrong – a shabby, tired old theory like “Phlogiston”, or “Geocentrism”, or “Dangerous, unprecedented Man Made Global Warming?” One.
But guess how BBC Radio 4 reported the story this morning? Yep. “98 per cent of scientists support global warming theory.” (Hat tip: Nick Mabbs)
Then again, since when did we expect any kind of honesty or decency from the Warmists? Have a look, for example, at this great analysis by the National Post’s Lawrence Solomon on how Warmist propagandists are using their useful idiots in the MSM to exaggerate the level of public credulousness in AGW.
In a New York Times op-ed, which has been much crowed-over by warmists, a Stanford university professor called Krosnick argued that – contrary to the impression given by every other opinion poll in the last three years – the majority of the US public is fully behind measures to ruin their economy in the name of combatting climate change.
In our survey, which was financed by a grant to Stanford from the National Science Foundation, 1,000 randomly selected American adults were interviewed by phone between June 1 and Monday. When respondents were asked if they thought that the earth’s temperature probably had been heating up over the last 100 years, 74 percent answered affirmatively. And 75 percent of respondents said that human behavior was substantially responsible for any warming that has occurred.
For many issues, any such consensus about the existence of a problem quickly falls apart when the conversation turns to carrying out specific solutions that will be costly. But not so here.
Fully 86 percent of our respondents said they wanted the federal government to limit the amount of air pollution that businesses emit, and 76 percent favored government limiting business’s emissions of greenhouse gases in particular. Not a majority of 55 or 60 percent — but 76 percent.
Solomon explains here how Krosnick rigs his questions in order to “hide the decline” in public support for AGW lunacy.
The best question of all, Krosnick found, came from adding an assumption of pessimism:” What do you think will be the most serious problem facing the world in the future if nothing is done to stop it?” When put this way, 25% of the public responded with “Global warming/the environment.” Krosnick doesn’t tell us how many of that 25% choose global warming versus the myriad of other environmental issues, such as air pollution, food and drinking water safety, wildlife and species protection, farmland or woodlands protection.
Krosnick recommends that pollsters ask his 25% question, believing it will obtain a result more useful for policy makers. He also chastises the press for interviewing global warming sceptics along with global warming advocates, saying this creates in the public mind the impression that the science is not settled on global warming. 6% of articles on global warming last year included the views of sceptics, a percentage Krosnick evidently views as too high.
Krosnick gets different results than other pollsters do by asking questions that some might consider bizarre. For example, when people told him that they didn’t believe global warming was happening, he asked them to pretend they did by asking them, “Assuming that global warming is happening, do you think a rise in the world’s temperature would be caused mostly by things people do, mostly by natural causes, or about equally by things people do and by natural causes? He then lumped the pretend response from people who don’t believe in global warming with a similar question asked of people who weren’t pretending about their belief in global warming. The result of the merger of these two groups was: 30% blame global warming on humans, 25% blame global warming on natural causes, and 45% believe humans and natural causes are about equally to blame. In the New York Times oped, Krosnick summarized this finding by pretenders and believers as “75% of respondents said that human behaviour was substantially responsible for any warming that has occurred,” even though many of those 75% didn’t believe that global warming was happening at all.
So when dealing with the Warmist lobby, always remember these helpful tips: sup with a long spoon, know that they’re lying from the fact that their lips are moving, and when they leave, make sure to count your fingers and your silverware.

Enhanced by Zemanta

A conservative view


On energy and the progressive plans for “cap and tax

A Conservative View

HUNTSVILLE — I will confess to having been in somewhat of a quandary the last couple of weeks. Said quandary has been that of trying to decide what topic to write about. Our Constitutional Republic (that’s right — not a Democracy) has never been more threatened by numerous assaults than it is at this time. After deliberation, I decided to write about the push by the current administration to pass “Cap and Tax” legislation.

Do we have crisis in our usage of petroleum products? Yes we do, but not as portrayed by the “progressives” and many of the media. Do we need regulation and inspection of petroleum production? Certainly we do. It is glaringly obvious that the governmental inspection of the well causing the current damage in the gulf was ineffectual. The events around that disaster will be included in a subsequent article.

In discussing the proposed “Cap and Tax” legislation, I will be obliged to use  a considerable amount of generalizations. These generalizations will represent my views regarding the real importance of this effort. For those detractors — this usage is at least as fair as the convoluted, stilted manner the legislation is written. Until there is direct, clear, transparent and comprehensive debate clarifying just what is intended, it is my contention that my generalizations are as valid as the bill.

Some basic assumptions are made by the administration and Congress to justify the need for this legislation. There is the assumption that “global warming” is real, and is a crisis. There is the further assumption that the federal government is the only entity capable of making the decisions necessary to combat this. Another assumption is that throwing billions (or trillions) of our tax dollars at the problem will fix it.

 There is a great deal of disagreement regarding the idea of “global warming.” Despite the progressive talking points alleging that a preponderance of scientific experts agree, that is not the case. There have been many instances uncovered that the core group of “experts” have more or less cooked the books by reporting data favorable to their theory and hiding data that would refute. The fact that some of these same “experts” have ties to organizations that stand to profit immensely from “Cap and Tax” makes this situation that much more questionable.

Regarding the federal government being the body to make those decisions; what problem do you recall that the government had made “better” by creating myriads of bureaucratic agencies doling out our tax dollars? I can think of exactly zero.

 It appears to me that there are two factors that are the prime movers of this attempt to pass “Cap and Tax.” One is power, and the other is money. As I read the House Bill (H.R. 2454; American Clean Energy And Security Act) sponsored by Waxman and Markey in 2009, the quest for additional growth and power of the federal government is apparent. Through bureaucracies created, and/or enhanced for the task, this bill would place in the hands of the federal government immense additional power that transcends bail-outs, and the taking over of financial institutions, health care and auto manufacturing. This would be done by the creation and control of “Carbon emission credits”.

 In order to combat the alleged “Global warming”, decisions will be made by governmental agencies to determine the amount of emissions allowable by essentially every entity in the country. Then, the federal government will make the decision and assign the number of carbon credits received by each of those entities, using a scale determined by the government. These carbon credits would be purchased from the government. Once purchased, the owner would then be free to use them to “pay” for emissions, or sell them to other entities through an approved exchange. One such exchange is already in existence, the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX).

This power play by the federal government is massive. One of the first steps would be acquiring greater control over the states. This would be done by forcing each state to provide a plan for each component of the legislation, using the threat of withholding  funds for non-compliance. This is the same as is being done with highway funds and others, but would be on a larger scale. States, faced with the burdensome regulation requirements, would essentially have no option for non-compliance.

The next step would be the enhanced control of utilities and manufacturing, which would have a tremendous burden regarding the development of “green energy” and compliance with a monstrous amount of “green energy” requirements for the manufacture of products, and for the products themselves. A huge increase in manufacturing costs would be inevitable. You know what that will do to prices. They will, as our President said about electricity prices, “necessarily skyrocket.”

 If you are thinking that the direct impact on you personally will not be all that bad, think again. If you have not done so yet, get on the internet and read this bill, particularly the section captioned Title II – Energy Efficiency.  In this section there are several factors that should be of interest. It speaks to assigning energy efficiency  “standards” to residences, and that these standards must be addressed as a part of any mortgages that are entered into — assuming the availability of a mortgage from a “green” bank, whatever that is.

In other words, an inspector from a governmental agency will be involved in the decision for you to buy or sell a house. This inspector and his agency will have the power to define what work you must have done to achieve compliance, and he or another government agent will have approval authority regarding who does the work, since there are requirements regarding “approved’ contractors, and the payment of prevailing wages.

I wonder — does this mean that the fix might be in for requiring union labor to do work you might be capable of doing for yourself?  What do you think?

Another factor regarding the consolidation of power by the federal government is the veritable pipeline of money (my taxes and yours) in the form of huge grants for academics to “study” various aspects of energy problems, and the billions of dollars that would be used to “redistribute” tax dollars in the form of subsidies to pay utility bills and foot the bill for renovations for millions of people. As an entitlement program, there is no real estimate yet as to its ultimate size. Could it get us to the tipping point that is approaching regarding entitlements that we are so near? You know the one — that point in which there are so many more of those who are receiving than those who are providing that our social system will crash.  I am afraid that it might.

There will not be space in this article to provide any wealth of discussion of the Chicago Climate Exchange, so it will be visited at a later date. It is my opinion that its primary purpose is tremendous enrichment of a number of the principals in this group, many of whom have ties to the same government officials who are pushing for “Cap and Tax”.

If this doesn’t cause you some indigestion, it should. Don’t take my word for it, or take the opposite side because of what I have said. Research it yourself. See for yourself, as best as you can, who are the people involved.  Look for yourself at the potential for this to be a scam that makes Barney Madoff “s scams seem small.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, January 7, 2010

- 18 C............

CARSHALTON BEECHES, UNITED KINGDOM - JANUARY 0...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Snow UK: what happens when it hits -18C

What happens when temperatures drop to -18C

 
Benson, Oxfordshire, which recorded a low of minus 17.7 degrees centigrade overnight
Benson, Oxfordshire, which recorded a low of minus 17.7 degrees centigrade overnightPhoto: PA
1. -18C is the recommended temperature at which to keep a household freezer
2. It is 0 farenheit.
3. It is the temperature at which table salt can no longer be used to melt ice
4. It is the temperature at which sunflower oil freezes
5. -18°C is the average temperature for this time of year in Irkutsk, Siberia.
6. It is also the average temperature at the summit of Mount Everest during July.
7. If the earth had no atmosphere at all, its surface temperature would be approximately -18C

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Met Office - 16 inches of snow TONIGHT!!!!! in Southern UK!!!!!!!!


Extreme weather warning as Met Office forecasts 16 INCHES of snow across southern England tonight

By SOPHIE FREEMAN
Last updated at 3:46 PM on 05th January 2010


  • Fears Britain could run out of gas after surge in demand to heat homes
  • Entire bus networks suspended, binmen diverted to gritting duties
  • Lorry driver killed, thousands caught up in tailbacks
  • Two people die in frozen lakes, one man missing
  • Shoppers begin panic-buying winter food and salt to clear paths
  • Thousands of pupils told to stay home as snow shuts schools
  • Business leaders warn of economic impact as staff fail to turn up
An 'extreme weather' alert was issued for southern England today as snow and ice brought transport networks to an abrupt halt.
Heavy snowfall is expected across southern areas of England that have not seen snow so far during this cold spell, as freezing conditions persist across the country.
The heavy snow that has been affecting Scotland and northern England is moving south and the heaviest falls over the next 24 hours are expected across parts of central and southern England and southeast Wales.

Slow drive: Cars trundle along in the snow at Sherburn in Elmet, North Yorkshire today
Slow motion: Cars trundle along in the snow at Sherburn in Elmet, North Yorkshire today
Stranded: A man struggles to push a car up a snow-covered hill in Wetherby, West Yorkshire
Stranded: A man struggles to push a car up a snow-covered hill in Wetherby, West Yorkshire, today
The Met Office said London and the South-East could expect up to a foot and a half of snow in some places leading to disruption on transport networks and power supplies.
It predicted exceptionally heavy snowfall was expected from around 8pm with 'accumulations of 15 to 30 centimetres (six to 12 inches) and perhaps in excess of 40cm (16 inches)'.
The heaviest snow is likely in the commuter belt of Hampshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire but up to 10 inches could hit the suburbs of London.
Such huge falls of snow would be more than four times those seen before Christmas which almost brought London to a standstill.
Tomorrow temperatures will barely rise above freezing.

Derek Turner from the Highways Agency urged motorists to drive safely.
'We are working flat out to keep our roads safe and serviceable for use,' he said. 'However, it is very important to drive appropriately for the conditions; and even when roads are treated and appear ice and snow free they should still be negotiated with care.'
The current cold weather started in mid December and has been the most prolonged spell of freezing conditions across the UK since December 1981. Bitterly cold and wintry weather is forecast to continue for the next couple of weeks with further snowfall expected at times.
A spokeswoman for the Met Office said snow can accumulate on power lines and bring them down, affecting supplies to homes. Similarly, snow can collect on branches of trees and if these snap, they can also bring down power lines.
Scotland and the North of England have so far been the worst hit by the snow today.

Airports have been closed, entire bus services have been suspended in some of the UK's major towns and cities, while motorists have become trapped in tailbacks up to 12 miles long.

 

It comes as business leaders warn of a major impact on the economy as employees fail to turn up for work during what is predicted to be one of the coldest winters in 100 years.
On the M60 near Bredbury, Greater Manchester, a lorry driver was killed after a collision with another HGV shortly after 10am today, while motorists on the M6 in Lancashire were caught up in 12-mile tailbacks.

White out: Thick snow covers the cars at a dealership in Manchester today
Going nowhere: Thick snow covers the cars at a dealership in Manchester today
Arctic blast: Krystyna Rudzki removes snow from her car before leaving for work as snow causes problems in Davenham, Cheshire
Arctic blast: A young woman removes snow from her car before leaving for work today as the weather causes problems in Davenham, Cheshire
A driver was also treated for shock today after his car skidded on to a level crossing in snow and was then hit by a train. British Transport Police said the 44-year-old managed to get out of his Ford Mondeo on the crossing near Selby, North Yorkshire, before the slow moving train crashed into it shortly after 8am.

The death toll over recent days rose higher after a woman in her 50s was found dead beneath the ice in a frozen pond on a village green. Emergency services were called to Frampton-on-Severn, Gloucestershire, after a dog walker spotted the shape of a body beneath the ice on Sunday.

Bold move: A tourist stands on the frozen ice of Trafalgar Square's fountains in London
Bold move: A tourist stands on the frozen ice of Trafalgar Square's fountains in London
In West Yorkshire, a 57-year-old man also died after being pulled from a freezing park lake.
The man, who has not yet been named, was found in the water at Harold Park, Bradford on Sunday night. He was pronounced dead in hospital.

Fears were also growing today for a 36-year-old man who has been missing for two days in freezing temperatures. A major search is under way for Ian Simpkin, from Ripon, North Yorkshire, who left home on foot on Sunday at 10am.
The freezing weather has led to fears that Britain could run short of gas after the National Grid warned power suppliers to use less of the fuel after seeing a 30 per cent rise on normal seasonal demand. It is only the second time such a warning has been issued in 30 years.

It comes as supermarkets report panic buying by shoppers desperate to stock up on comfort food and anti-freeze. Cat litter and salt is also proving popular in icy areas, with customers using it to clear their roads and pathways.
Asda said sales of its thermal underwear had soared by 1,000 per cent, with fire logs up 71 per cent and vacuum flasks up 129 per cent. Wellington boots, puddings and take-away food are also selling well, the retailer said.
Halfords said it had seen a five-fold increase in sales of snow chains, which are attached to wheels to increase road grip, since the cold snap began.

Six inches of snow is forecast to fall today as the icy blast tightens its grip. The South is expected to see the worst of the weather as heavy winter showers move south across England and Wales throughout the day.

Snow forced the closure of Manchester, Leeds-Bradford and Liverpool airports this morning, while ten train services between London and Leeds on the East Coast Main Line have been cancelled and thousands of school pupils have been told to stay home. 

Dozens of schools failed to reopen yesterday and remain closed today, leaving thousands of parents searching for last-minute childcare.
Airports round-up

Manchester: Reopened at 12.30pm, many flights cancelled, severe delays

Liverpool: Now reopened, but with delays and flight cancellations

Glasgow: Open, but delays and cancellations
Heathrow: Open, but check with airline
Gatwick: Open, but check with airline
Luton: Open, but check with airline
Southampton: Open, but check with airline
Birmingham: Open, but check with airline
Leeds-Bradford: Now reopened

 
In the North West, more than 130 schools have been closed in Greater Manchester, 73 in Lancashire and 116 in Cumbria.
Bus operator Stagecoach said it had suspended many of its services across Greater Manchester because of the conditions, but was trying to operate on main routes into the city.
All proceedings at Manchester Crown Court were cancelled for the day due to the weather, while the city centre resembled a ghost town as shoppers stayed home.

Bus services in Sheffield and Barnsley in South Yorkshire have been suspended until roads are made safe and there are reports of widespread road problems across the county. The centre of Rotherham is said to be 'gridlocked'.
Bin collections have been scrapped in many Northern towns and cities, with refuse collectors diverted to gritting and snow-clearing duties. 
Thousands of schools have been closed across Scotland, the North East, Yorkshire and the North West.

Hundreds of schools have also been shut across Wales.
Winter wonderland: Walkers in Allendale, Northumberland after heavy snow fall today
Winter wonderland: Walkers in Allendale, Northumberland after heavy snow fall today

This was the scene in snow covered street in Perth, Scotland this morning
This was the scene in snow covered street in Perth, Scotland this morning



In addition to the London to Leeds rail service cancellations, several London to Glasgow services on the East Coast main Line are currently stopping at Edinburgh. The line operator said it would be operating a revised timetable today due to the adverse weather conditions.
Liverpool John Lennon Airport was forced to close at 5.30am this morning due to heavy snow and ice and a number of flights have been cancelled. The airport reopened shortly after 10am today with heavy delays.

Manchester Airport was also closed earlier today and all flights were suspended until midday.

Budget airline easyJet has cancelled 37 flights on its European network.
Grounded: Flights were suspended at Manchester Airport today as tractors and ploughs attempted to clear the runway

Grounded: Flights were suspended at Manchester Airport today as tractors attempted to clear the runway
On the roads, part of the A66 between County Durham and Cumbria are closed, while snow on the A1 in Northumberland is causing problems for motorists, with extreme caution being urged.

The RAC said it is currently dealing with around 1,400 incidents an hour.
Major sporting fixtures also fell victim to the weather, with Blackburn forced to call off the first leg of its League Cup semifinal against Aston Villa. Manchester City is due to host Manchester United in the other semifinal on Wednesday, but the Eastlands ticket office and ground was closed today.

The Met Office has issued an advisory for heavy snow and ice across much of the UK today, with up to six inches of snow forecast for Hampshire, Dorset, Wiltshire and Oxfordshire tonight.

A postman delivers mail in the snow near the town of Bewdley in Worcestershire today
A postman delivers mail in the snow near the town of Bewdley in Worcestershire today
Jams: Traffic comes to a standstill on the A1 in Newcastle during rush hour this morning
Jams: Traffic comes to a standstill on the A1 in Newcastle during rush hour this morning


A spokesman said: 'Most places could get some snow, with the showers moving down from the Pennines and Peaks to the South of England by the evening.
'The South could see around six inches on Tuesday evening, while there will be a few centimetres elsewhere.'
Temperatures will plummet to a treacherous -8C (18F) tonight and Wednesday morning, he added.
MeteoGroup forecaster Brendan Jones said the cold spell was 'purely because of the wind direction across the UK'.
'The prevailing wind that our weather comes from is usually from the south-west and west and that means the weather usually comes from the Atlantic,' he said.
'We do get cold spells every winter but, because the weather tends to come from the west, winters are usually mild and wet with occasional cold spells.
The River Tyne freezes over in Chollerford, Newcastle today
Two pictures showing the River Tyne which has frozen over today at Chollerford, Newcastle

A woman and a dog look at the River Tyne


'For the last three weeks, since mid-December, winds have come in from the north and east and everywhere in between.

'It has been the complete opposite of what usually happens.

'The wind has either been coming from the Arctic or from Scandinavia and parts of Siberia - all the cold places.

'Our source of warmer and milder weather has been completely cut off.'

In Scotland, Renfrewshire and Fife Councils said they were being forced to preserve salt stocks and warned of 'significant problems' if supplies were not replenished.
The moves will provoke fears that councils in England and Wales could also run out of grit and salt within days. 
The sub-zero temperatures and snow showers are expected to continue until at least the weekend.

Forecaster Stephen Davenport said the: 'This is stretching the limits of short to medium term forecasting but so entrenched is this cold-weather pattern that it seems only a major upheaval in the atmosphere will bring a return to something milder.
BBC weather map
BBC weather map
The BBC weather map showing the snow moving across central and western areas of England today and then moving further east while blanketing most of Scotland tomorrow
'Should conditions continue in a similar vein then by March we might just be looking back at one of the coldest winters of the last 100 years.'
The warning follows another day of misery for commuters - and an extra day's holiday for up to three million workers who used the freezing conditions as an excuse to stay at home. 
Business lobby groups estimated that as many as one in ten failed to make it back into the office yesterday after the two-week festive break.

Northern England and Scotland saw the worst of the winter yesterday as temperatures plunged to -12c (10f).
The Met Office yesterday confirmed that December was the coldest in Britain since 1995. However, despite the chilly snap, the whole of 2009 was milder than 2008 and remained the 14th warmest year in the UK since records began in 1914, it added.

Cross-country: A woman makes her way across heavy snow in Harrogate, North Yorkshire today
Cross-country: A woman makes her way across heavy snow in Harrogate, North Yorkshire today
The Federation of Small Businesses said it estimates about ten per cent of Britain's workers could not bear to go back to work.
Stephen Alambritis, from the business lobby group, said: 'Some will have had a genuine reason, but many are just trying it on.
'They may have just drunk too much and ate too much over Christmas, and they just can't be bothered to go into work.'
He estimates the cost to the economy will be about £600million from lost productivity and lost taxes.
Other business lobby groups said workers who stayed at home were not being fair on their colleagues or their companies. 
A car stuck in central Manchester is pushed out of the snow
A car stuck in central Manchester is pushed out of the snow
Fun in the snow: A woman walks her dog in Cale Green Park, Stockport, this morning following heavy overnight snow
Fun in the snow: A woman walks her dog in Cale Green Park, Stockport, this morning
The Forum of Private Business estimated the cost to the economy would be lower, at around £230million, but this is still equivalent to a drop of around five per cent in the country's daily economic output.
Chief executive of the forum, Phil Orford, said: 'There may be cases where some staff members are unable to come into work for legitimate reasons.

'But others have clearly view this cold snap as an opportunity to stay at home with potentially damaging effects on small firms and the economy.
'Small employers need their key staff to be responsible, brave the harsh weather and come in wherever possible.
'It is a case of all hands to the pump, particularly given the recessionary conditions we are still facing.'

Many workers may have tried to get to work but genuinely had trouble with their car, according to the AA.
As news of the gas warning emerged today, Gordon Brown said he remained confident that Britain would manage okay.
'I think Britain can deal with these problems,' he said. 'There are always difficulties when we have a long spell of bad weather. But we can cope.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1240629/At-mercy-deep-freeze-Schools-shut-firms-hit--6-inches-snow.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo#ixzz0bkuzRaPn